In essence, personal injury cases are all about restitution. Someone has been hurt and seeks to hold whoever is responsible accountable through financial compensation or other legal action. However, the pain suffered by the injured must be the result of negligent or intentionally hurtful behavior.
These wrongful acts fall under Tort Law. They are just shy of criminal behavior that would normally involve the state. However, sometimes, there’s some room for overlap.
As far as personal injury lawsuits are concerned, there’s a staggering variety of claims that typically reach courtrooms daily. However, here are just a few of the most noteworthy ones:
These types of claims are against a manufacturer when a product has been proven to adversely affect the health of the user in a way that wasn’t warned against at purchase. Nearly any kind of product can be the subject of a product liability case, but they are typically medical devices, vehicles, or children’s products.
In these claims, the burden of proof is entirely on the plaintiff as to proving that the product is defective. Here are what the plaintiff needs to prove – the product was defective from its intended purpose, the defendant didn’t make the product with the level of care advertised, a lack of care on the part of the defendant, the defect in the product caused an injury to the plaintiff, or that the damages incurred by the plaintiff could be reasonably foreseeable from the eyes of the defendant.
It should be noted that none of those individual conditions are easy to prove, and require an obvious progression from beginning to end, as to how the defendant is guilty of the injuries the plaintiff is suffering from. The negligence that goes into their liability must be objectively defined and proven in a court of law if the plaintiff is to expect compensation.
Occasionally, a patient undergoing a medical procedure will sustain complications from that procedure that can be reliably tied to errors made on the part of the institution, or individual care providers that performed the procedure. It’s in these cases that a medical malpractice lawsuit can be brought to the attention of the courts.
In essence, the plaintiff is trying to prove that an omission or mistake was made during the course of the care that the person carrying out the procedure should have known better than have committed. If this is proven, the medical practitioner can be held accountable for the damages suffered due to this mistake. For instance, if a doctor fails to explain all of the associated risks with medical treatment or not explain what was to be done properly, the plaintiff can then sue based on those facts.
These cases tend to be insanely complicated and are best left to very qualified lawyers with many years of experience handling these kinds of cases.
Defamation of character lawsuits are characterized by a plaintiff who alleges that something claimed as fact about them by the defendant is, in fact, false and it hurts their reputation as a result. These cases are predicated on the idea that the idea that was presented as a fact isn’t objectively provable, and that the harm to the plaintiff’s personal life is measurable and significant.
Firstly, the plaintiff needs to prove that the defendant made the statement in the first place. This can be either through direct evidence, such as a witness that can confirm that the defendant made the statement, or through circumstantial evidence that proves the defendant made a claim by back-tracing logical conclusions until the defendant making the claim can be proven.
From there, the plaintiff will then say what damages they incurred because of the claims made by the defendant. These claims can range from loss of employment, harm to their family life, harm to their professional or personal reputation, as well as other miscellaneous forms of pain and suffering.
Invasion of Privacy
These cases tend to be complicated, but they all hinge on the privacy of the plaintiffs having had their privacy breached by the defendant, in a way that wasn’t agreed upon beforehand, and in a way that violates their fundamental rights to privacy. A straightforward example is that if a school was to loan laptops out to their students to take home, and it was later found that individuals at the school could remotely access the webcams of these laptops while the students had them at home, this would be a serious invasion of privacy and would be worthy of court time.
Simply put, this is an intrusion into the personal life of another person without their consent. There are multiple ways that privacy can be intruded upon, however. One significant way is through taking the name of an individual for their own benefit, such as by publishing a customer testimonial under someone’s name without their consent.
The next form of invasion of privacy is by intruding on an individual’s right to seclusion and solitude. Taking pictures of somebody inside of their private home without consent is a perfect example of this kind of behavior. Illegal surveillance without consent is most often what these cases are based on.
Another form of invasion of privacy lawsuit is when private information about an individual is released, which may negatively affect the individual’s standing in their community by putting them in a negative light. In these cases, the defendant publicly releases information about the plaintiff that was entirely private for them, and that they had no right releasing without the consent of the plaintiff.
If any of these cases sound familiar to you, then you might be entitled to a personal injury lawsuit or to seek a lawyer to defend against allegations brought against you. These cases are incredibly complex, and decisions are made based on the amount of evidence and the quality of the evidence brought before the courts by both parties. Marreitt Legal (marriettlegal.com)is the type of skilled lawyer required to navigate these proceedings as gracefully as possible, no matter whether or not you happen to be the plaintiff or the defendant.